AIMS: Pacific vs Namibia: Adjusted net enrolment rate, one year before the official primary
AIMS: Pacific
81.2%
in 2024
Namibia
91.8%
in 2024
AIMS: Pacific rank
62nd
Namibia rank
65th
Adjusted net enrolment rate, one year before the official primary over time
- AIMS: Pacific
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 91.8% against 81.2% in AIMS: Pacific, a difference of 10.6%.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times AIMS: Pacific's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2010 it was AIMS: Pacific ahead.
AIMS: Pacific ranks 62nd and Namibia ranks 65th of 208 groups.
Across the 2 decades both report, AIMS: Pacific averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: Pacific | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 74.0% | 71.0% | 2.9% | AIMS: Pacific |
| 2020s | 79.9% | 84.6% | 4.7% | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net enrolment rate, one year before the official primary, AIMS: Pacific or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 91.8% against 81.2% in AIMS: Pacific as of 2024.
- What is the difference in adjusted net enrolment rate, one year before the official primary between AIMS: Pacific and Namibia?
- 10.6%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Pacific and Namibia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do AIMS: Pacific and Namibia rank globally for adjusted net enrolment rate, one year before the official primary?
- AIMS: Pacific ranks 62nd and Namibia ranks 65th of 208 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Adjusted net enrolment rate, one year before the official primary entry age, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release