China vs Iceland: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 35-39 with no education
China
1.7%
in 2010
Iceland
2.0%
in 2010
China rank
92nd
Iceland rank
89th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 35-39 with no education over time
- China
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 2.0% against 1.7% in China, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.2 times China's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was China ahead.
China ranks 92nd and Iceland ranks 89th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, China averaged higher in 5 and Iceland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 57.7% | 0.6% | 57.1% | China |
| 1970s | 26.9% | 0.6% | 26.3% | China |
| 1980s | 15.2% | 0.4% | 14.8% | China |
| 1990s | 13.2% | 2.0% | 11.2% | China |
| 2000s | 2.8% | 1.8% | 1.0% | China |
| 2010s | 1.7% | 2.0% | 0.3% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 35-39 with no education, China or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 2.0% against 1.7% in China as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 35-39 with no education between China and Iceland?
- 0.3%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Iceland?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do China and Iceland rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 35-39 with no education?
- China ranks 92nd and Iceland ranks 89th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Robert J. Barro and Jong-Wha Lee: http://www.barrolee.com/, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 35-39 with no education. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population age 35-39 with no education