Romania vs Sri Lanka: Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 20-24, female
Romania
833
in 2010
Sri Lanka
867
in 2010
Romania rank
53rd
Sri Lanka rank
50th
Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 20-24, female over time
- Romania
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 867 against 833 in Romania, a difference of 34.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Romania ahead.
Romania ranks 53rd and Sri Lanka ranks 50th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Romania averaged higher in 4 and Sri Lanka in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 729.5 | 445 | 284.5 | Romania |
| 1970s | 808.5 | 592.5 | 216 | Romania |
| 1980s | 776 | 748.5 | 27.5 | Romania |
| 1990s | 931.5 | 841.5 | 90 | Romania |
| 2000s | 859 | 928 | 69 | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 833 | 867 | 34 | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: population in thousands, age 20-24, female, Romania or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 867 against 833 in Romania as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: population in thousands, age 20-24, female between Romania and Sri Lanka?
- 34, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Sri Lanka?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Romania and Sri Lanka rank globally for barro-lee: population in thousands, age 20-24, female?
- Romania ranks 53rd and Sri Lanka ranks 50th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Robert J. Barro and Jong-Wha Lee: http://www.barrolee.com/, published as Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 20-24, female. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Population in thousands, age 20-24, female is the female population of 20-24 year olds in thousands estimated by Barro-Lee.