Congo vs Lithuania: Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 35-39, female (35-39 female)
Congo
106
in 2010
Lithuania
122
in 2010
Congo rank
113th
Lithuania rank
110th
Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 35-39, female (35-39 female) over time
- Congo
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 122 against 106 in Congo, a difference of 16.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 113th and Lithuania ranks 110th of 144 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 30.5 | 111.5 | 81 | Lithuania |
| 1970s | 37.5 | 125.5 | 88 | Lithuania |
| 1980s | 49 | 117 | 68 | Lithuania |
| 1990s | 64.5 | 133 | 68.5 | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 83 | 131.5 | 48.5 | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 106 | 122 | 16 | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: population in thousands, age 35-39, female, Congo or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 122 against 106 in Congo as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: population in thousands, age 35-39, female between Congo and Lithuania?
- 16, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Lithuania?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Congo and Lithuania rank globally for barro-lee: population in thousands, age 35-39, female?
- Congo ranks 113th and Lithuania ranks 110th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Robert J. Barro and Jong-Wha Lee: http://www.barrolee.com/, published as Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 35-39, female. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Population in thousands, age 35-39, female is the female population of 35-39 year olds in thousands estimated by Barro-Lee.