Latvia vs Namibia: Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 35-39, female
Latvia
79
in 2010
Namibia
49
in 2010
Latvia rank
120th
Namibia rank
122nd
Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 35-39, female over time
- Latvia
- Namibia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 79 against 49 in Namibia, a difference of 30.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.6 times Namibia's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 120th and Namibia ranks 122nd of 144 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 90.5 | 18 | 72.5 | Latvia |
| 1970s | 96.5 | 20.5 | 76 | Latvia |
| 1980s | 88.5 | 25 | 63.5 | Latvia |
| 1990s | 96.5 | 40 | 56.5 | Latvia |
| 2000s | 84 | 53.5 | 30.5 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 79 | 49 | 30 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: population in thousands, age 35-39, female, Latvia or Namibia?
- Latvia, at 79 against 49 in Namibia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: population in thousands, age 35-39, female between Latvia and Namibia?
- 30, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Namibia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Latvia and Namibia rank globally for barro-lee: population in thousands, age 35-39, female?
- Latvia ranks 120th and Namibia ranks 122nd of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Robert J. Barro and Jong-Wha Lee: http://www.barrolee.com/, published as Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 35-39, female. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Population in thousands, age 35-39, female is the female population of 35-39 year olds in thousands estimated by Barro-Lee.