Mauritius vs Namibia: Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 35-39, total
Mauritius
93
in 2010
Namibia
102
in 2010
Mauritius rank
125th
Namibia rank
123rd
Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 35-39, total over time
- Mauritius
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 102 against 93 in Mauritius, a difference of 9.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Namibia ahead.
Mauritius ranks 125th and Namibia ranks 123rd of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 3 and Namibia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 35.5 | 36.5 | 1 | Namibia |
| 1970s | 46.5 | 41.5 | 5 | Mauritius |
| 1980s | 60 | 48 | 12 | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 86.5 | 75 | 11.5 | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 100.5 | 104.5 | 4 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 93 | 102 | 9 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: population in thousands, age 35-39, total, Mauritius or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 102 against 93 in Mauritius as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: population in thousands, age 35-39, total between Mauritius and Namibia?
- 9, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Namibia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Mauritius and Namibia rank globally for barro-lee: population in thousands, age 35-39, total?
- Mauritius ranks 125th and Namibia ranks 123rd of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Robert J. Barro and Jong-Wha Lee: http://www.barrolee.com/, published as Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 35-39, total. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Population in thousands, age 35-39, total is the total population of 35-39 year olds in thousands estimated by Barro-Lee.