Mauritius vs Namibia: Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 40-44, total
Mauritius
98
in 2010
Namibia
88
in 2010
Mauritius rank
122nd
Namibia rank
123rd
Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 40-44, total over time
- Mauritius
- Namibia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 98 against 88 in Namibia, a difference of 10.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Namibia ahead.
Mauritius ranks 122nd and Namibia ranks 123rd of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 5 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 30 | 31 | 1 | Namibia |
| 1970s | 40.5 | 37.5 | 3 | Mauritius |
| 1980s | 46.5 | 40 | 6.5 | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 69.5 | 60 | 9.5 | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 95.5 | 85.5 | 10 | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 98 | 88 | 10 | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: population in thousands, age 40-44, total, Mauritius or Namibia?
- Mauritius, at 98 against 88 in Namibia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: population in thousands, age 40-44, total between Mauritius and Namibia?
- 10, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Namibia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Mauritius and Namibia rank globally for barro-lee: population in thousands, age 40-44, total?
- Mauritius ranks 122nd and Namibia ranks 123rd of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Robert J. Barro and Jong-Wha Lee: http://www.barrolee.com/, published as Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 40-44, total. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Population in thousands, age 40-44, total is the total population of 40-44 year olds in thousands estimated by Barro-Lee.