Ireland vs New Zealand: Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 45-49, female
Ireland
154
in 2010
New Zealand
161
in 2010
Ireland rank
95th
New Zealand rank
92nd
Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 45-49, female over time
- Ireland
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 161 against 154 in Ireland, a difference of 7.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Ireland ahead.
Ireland ranks 95th and New Zealand ranks 92nd of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Ireland averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 84.5 | 70.5 | 14 | Ireland |
| 1970s | 79.5 | 77.5 | 2 | Ireland |
| 1980s | 76.5 | 77 | 0.5 | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 99.5 | 107.5 | 8 | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 127 | 139 | 12 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 154 | 161 | 7 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: population in thousands, age 45-49, female, Ireland or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 161 against 154 in Ireland as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: population in thousands, age 45-49, female between Ireland and New Zealand?
- 7, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and New Zealand?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Ireland and New Zealand rank globally for barro-lee: population in thousands, age 45-49, female?
- Ireland ranks 95th and New Zealand ranks 92nd of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Robert J. Barro and Jong-Wha Lee: http://www.barrolee.com/, published as Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 45-49, female. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Population in thousands, age 45-49, female is the female population of 45-49 year olds in thousands estimated by Barro-Lee.