Mauritius vs Namibia: Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 45-49, total
Mauritius
99
in 2010
Namibia
79
in 2010
Mauritius rank
122nd
Namibia rank
125th
Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 45-49, total over time
- Mauritius
- Namibia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 99 against 79 in Namibia, a difference of 20.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.3 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Namibia ahead.
Mauritius ranks 122nd and Namibia ranks 125th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 4 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 24 | 26.5 | 2.5 | Namibia |
| 1970s | 33 | 33 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 40 | 35 | 5 | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 52 | 49 | 3 | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 82.5 | 68.5 | 14 | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 99 | 79 | 20 | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: population in thousands, age 45-49, total, Mauritius or Namibia?
- Mauritius, at 99 against 79 in Namibia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: population in thousands, age 45-49, total between Mauritius and Namibia?
- 20, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Namibia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Mauritius and Namibia rank globally for barro-lee: population in thousands, age 45-49, total?
- Mauritius ranks 122nd and Namibia ranks 125th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Robert J. Barro and Jong-Wha Lee: http://www.barrolee.com/, published as Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 45-49, total. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Population in thousands, age 45-49, total is the total population of 45-49 year olds in thousands estimated by Barro-Lee.