Mauritius vs Namibia: Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 55-59, total
Mauritius
71
in 2010
Namibia
53
in 2010
Mauritius rank
123rd
Namibia rank
125th
Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 55-59, total over time
- Mauritius
- Namibia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 71 against 53 in Namibia, a difference of 18.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.3 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Namibia ahead.
Mauritius ranks 123rd and Namibia ranks 125th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 4 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 15 | 17.5 | 2.5 | Namibia |
| 1970s | 20.5 | 22.5 | 2 | Namibia |
| 1980s | 31.5 | 27.5 | 4 | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 34 | 32.5 | 1.5 | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 46.5 | 44 | 2.5 | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 71 | 53 | 18 | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: population in thousands, age 55-59, total, Mauritius or Namibia?
- Mauritius, at 71 against 53 in Namibia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: population in thousands, age 55-59, total between Mauritius and Namibia?
- 18, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Namibia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Mauritius and Namibia rank globally for barro-lee: population in thousands, age 55-59, total?
- Mauritius ranks 123rd and Namibia ranks 125th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Robert J. Barro and Jong-Wha Lee: http://www.barrolee.com/, published as Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 55-59, total. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Population in thousands, age 55-59, total is the total population of 55-59 year olds in thousands estimated by Barro-Lee.