Ireland vs New Zealand: Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 60-64, female
Ireland
111
in 2010
New Zealand
116
in 2010
Ireland rank
87th
New Zealand rank
85th
Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 60-64, female over time
- Ireland
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 116 against 111 in Ireland, a difference of 5.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Ireland ahead.
Ireland ranks 87th and New Zealand ranks 85th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Ireland averaged higher in 3 and New Zealand in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 64.5 | 46.5 | 18 | Ireland |
| 1970s | 69 | 61 | 8 | Ireland |
| 1980s | 71.5 | 69 | 2.5 | Ireland |
| 1990s | 69 | 69.5 | 0.5 | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 80.5 | 84 | 3.5 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 111 | 116 | 5 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: population in thousands, age 60-64, female, Ireland or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 116 against 111 in Ireland as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: population in thousands, age 60-64, female between Ireland and New Zealand?
- 5, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and New Zealand?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Ireland and New Zealand rank globally for barro-lee: population in thousands, age 60-64, female?
- Ireland ranks 87th and New Zealand ranks 85th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Robert J. Barro and Jong-Wha Lee: http://www.barrolee.com/, published as Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 60-64, female. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Population in thousands, age 60-64, female is the female population of 60-64 year olds in thousands estimated by Barro-Lee.