Ghana vs Malaysia: Current education expenditure, secondary
Current education expenditure, secondary over time
- Ghana
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 96.5% against 96.5% in Ghana, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Ghana ahead.
Ghana ranks 39th and Malaysia ranks 38th of 125 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.3% | 88.7% | 1.4% | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 89.1% | 93.8% | 4.6% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher current education expenditure, secondary, Ghana or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 96.5% against 96.5% in Ghana as of 2021.
- What is the difference in current education expenditure, secondary between Ghana and Malaysia?
- 0.0%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Malaysia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2013.
- How do Ghana and Malaysia rank globally for current education expenditure, secondary?
- Ghana ranks 39th and Malaysia ranks 38th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Data API, UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), published as Current education expenditure, secondary (% of total expenditure in secondary public institutions). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Current expenditure is expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Current expenditure is consumed within the current year and would have to be renewed if needed in the following year. It includes staff compensation and current expenditure other than for staff compensation (ex. on teaching materials, ancillary services and administration).