Botswana vs ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302): Enrolment in primary education, both sexes (number), gaps filled

Botswana
381,674
in 2022
ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302)
60.63 million
in 2024
Botswana rank
121st
ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302) rank
119th

Enrolment in primary education, both sexes (number), gaps filled over time

  • Botswana
  • ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302)
020.0M40.0M60.0M197019972024

How they compare

ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302) currently reports 60.63 million against 381,674 in Botswana, a difference of 60.25 million.

That makes ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302)'s figure about 158.9 times Botswana's.

Across all 48 years both countries report, ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302) has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 121st and ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302) ranks 119th of 218 countries.

ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302) has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302) Difference Ahead
1970s 112,362 48.19 million 48.08 million ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302)
1980s 219,035 59.13 million 58.91 million ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302)
1990s 309,775 64.70 million 64.39 million ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302)
2000s 328,887 67.73 million 67.40 million ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302)
2010s 337,381 64.85 million 64.51 million ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302)
2020s 373,481 61.25 million 60.88 million ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enrolment in primary education, both sexes (number), gaps filled, Botswana or ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302)?
ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302), at 60.63 million against 381,674 in Botswana as of 2024.
What is the difference in enrolment in primary education, both sexes (number), gaps filled between Botswana and ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302)?
60.25 million, with ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302)?
48 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do Botswana and ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302) rank globally for enrolment in primary education, both sexes (number), gaps filled?
Botswana ranks 121st and ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302) ranks 119th of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Enrolment in primary education, both sexes (number), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302): Enrolment in primary education, both sexes (number), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/enrolment-in-primary-education-both-sexes-number-gaps-filled/botswana/eclac-latin-america-unsdcode-98302/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/enrolment-in-primary-education-both-sexes-number-gaps-filled/botswana/eclac-latin-america-unsdcode-98302/">Botswana vs ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302): Enrolment in primary education, both sexes (number), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enrolment in primary education, both sexes (number), gaps filled
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
439 places, 21,662 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

Enrolment in primary education, both sexes (number) with 607 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.