ALECSO: Least Developed Countries vs Namibia: Enrolment in primary education, male (number), annual growth rate

ALECSO: Least Developed Countries
1.97 % change on previous year
in 2020
Namibia
4.5 % change on previous year
in 2024
ALECSO: Least Developed Countries rank
22nd
Namibia rank
20th

Enrolment in primary education, male (number), annual growth rate over time

  • ALECSO: Least Developed Countries
  • Namibia
0510199020072024

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 4.5 % change on previous year against 1.97 % change on previous year in ALECSO: Least Developed Countries, a difference of 2.53 % change on previous year.

That makes Namibia's figure about 2.3 times ALECSO: Least Developed Countries's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1999 it was ALECSO: Least Developed Countries ahead.

ALECSO: Least Developed Countries ranks 22nd and Namibia ranks 20th of 221 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, ALECSO: Least Developed Countries averaged higher in 3 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade ALECSO: Least Developed Countries Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 2.96 % change on previous year -0.9371 % change on previous year 3.9 % change on previous year ALECSO: Least Developed Countries
2000s 3.49 % change on previous year 0.7539 % change on previous year 2.73 % change on previous year ALECSO: Least Developed Countries
2010s 2.02 % change on previous year 2.32 % change on previous year 0.2992 % change on previous year Namibia
2020s 1.97 % change on previous year 1.7 % change on previous year 0.273 % change on previous year ALECSO: Least Developed Countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enrolment in primary education, male (number), annual growth rate, ALECSO: Least Developed Countries or Namibia?
Namibia, at 4.5 % change on previous year against 1.97 % change on previous year in ALECSO: Least Developed Countries as of 2024.
What is the difference in enrolment in primary education, male (number), annual growth rate between ALECSO: Least Developed Countries and Namibia?
2.53 % change on previous year, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ALECSO: Least Developed Countries and Namibia?
22 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2020.
How do ALECSO: Least Developed Countries and Namibia rank globally for enrolment in primary education, male (number), annual growth rate?
ALECSO: Least Developed Countries ranks 22nd and Namibia ranks 20th of 221 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Enrolment in primary education, male (number), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ALECSO: Least Developed Countries vs Namibia: Enrolment in primary education, male (number), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/enrolment-in-primary-education-male-number-annual-growth-rate/alecso-least-developed-countries/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/enrolment-in-primary-education-male-number-annual-growth-rate/alecso-least-developed-countries/namibia/">ALECSO: Least Developed Countries vs Namibia: Enrolment in primary education, male (number), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enrolment in primary education, male (number), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
434 places, 19,250 data points, 1971–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Enrolment in primary education, male (number). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.