Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Zimbabwe: Enrolment in secondary education, both sexes (number), per square

Lao People's Democratic Republic
2.46 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
2.48 units per square kilometre
in 2013
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
159th
Zimbabwe rank
158th

Enrolment in secondary education, both sexes (number), per square over time

  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
  • Zimbabwe
0123197019962023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 2.48 units per square kilometre against 2.46 units per square kilometre in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 0.02 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 159th and Zimbabwe ranks 158th of 205 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Lao People's Democratic Republic averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lao People's Democratic Republic Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 0.1765 units per square kilometre 0.1708 units per square kilometre 0.0057 units per square kilometre Lao People's Democratic Republic
1980s 0.4607 units per square kilometre 0.991 units per square kilometre 0.5303 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.715 units per square kilometre 1.85 units per square kilometre 1.13 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 1.33 units per square kilometre 2.13 units per square kilometre 0.802 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 2.31 units per square kilometre 2.98 units per square kilometre 0.6757 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enrolment in secondary education, both sexes (number), per square, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 2.48 units per square kilometre against 2.46 units per square kilometre in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2013.
What is the difference in enrolment in secondary education, both sexes (number), per square between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Zimbabwe?
0.02 units per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2013.
How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Zimbabwe rank globally for enrolment in secondary education, both sexes (number), per square?
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 159th and Zimbabwe ranks 158th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Enrolment in secondary education, both sexes (number), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Zimbabwe: Enrolment in secondary education, both sexes (number), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/enrolment-in-secondary-education-both-sexes-number-per-square-kilometre/lao-pdr/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/enrolment-in-secondary-education-both-sexes-number-per-square-kilometre/lao-pdr/zimbabwe/">Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Zimbabwe: Enrolment in secondary education, both sexes (number), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enrolment in secondary education, both sexes (number), per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 7,231 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Enrolment in secondary education, both sexes (number) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.