Mauritius vs SDG: Australia and New Zealand: Enrolment in secondary education, female (number), annual growth rate

Mauritius
-5.38 % change on previous year
in 2020
SDG: Australia and New Zealand
-0.0007 % change on previous year
in 2024
Mauritius rank
205th
SDG: Australia and New Zealand rank
202nd

Enrolment in secondary education, female (number), annual growth rate over time

  • Mauritius
  • SDG: Australia and New Zealand
-20-1001020197219982024

How they compare

SDG: Australia and New Zealand currently reports -0.0007 % change on previous year against -5.38 % change on previous year in Mauritius, a difference of 5.38 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 205th and SDG: Australia and New Zealand ranks 202nd of 214 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 2 and SDG: Australia and New Zealand in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius SDG: Australia and New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 1.05 % change on previous year -0.3225 % change on previous year 1.38 % change on previous year Mauritius
2000s 2.49 % change on previous year 0.4619 % change on previous year 2.03 % change on previous year Mauritius
2010s -0.6938 % change on previous year -0.2818 % change on previous year 0.412 % change on previous year SDG: Australia and New Zealand
2020s -5.38 % change on previous year -0.6783 % change on previous year 4.7 % change on previous year SDG: Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enrolment in secondary education, female (number), annual growth rate, Mauritius or SDG: Australia and New Zealand?
SDG: Australia and New Zealand, at -0.0007 % change on previous year against -5.38 % change on previous year in Mauritius as of 2024.
What is the difference in enrolment in secondary education, female (number), annual growth rate between Mauritius and SDG: Australia and New Zealand?
5.38 % change on previous year, with SDG: Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and SDG: Australia and New Zealand?
22 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2020.
How do Mauritius and SDG: Australia and New Zealand rank globally for enrolment in secondary education, female (number), annual growth rate?
Mauritius ranks 205th and SDG: Australia and New Zealand ranks 202nd of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Enrolment in secondary education, female (number), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs SDG: Australia and New Zealand: Enrolment in secondary education, female (number), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/enrolment-in-secondary-education-female-number-annual-growth-rate/mauritius/sdg-australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/enrolment-in-secondary-education-female-number-annual-growth-rate/mauritius/sdg-australia-and-new-zealand/">Mauritius vs SDG: Australia and New Zealand: Enrolment in secondary education, female (number), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enrolment in secondary education, female (number), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
435 places, 17,565 data points, 1971–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Enrolment in secondary education, female (number). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.