Timor-Leste vs UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries: Enrolment in secondary education, female (number), gaps filled

Timor-Leste
83,943
in 2020
UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries
14.60 million
in 2024
Timor-Leste rank
139th
UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries rank
142nd

Enrolment in secondary education, female (number), gaps filled over time

  • Timor-Leste
  • UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries
05.0M10.0M15.0M197019972024

How they compare

UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries currently reports 14.60 million against 83,943 in Timor-Leste, a difference of 14.52 million.

That makes UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries's figure about 174.0 times Timor-Leste's.

Across all 17 years both countries report, UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries has been ahead every year.

Timor-Leste ranks 139th and UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries ranks 142nd of 218 countries.

UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Timor-Leste UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries Difference Ahead
2000s 38,610 13.10 million 13.06 million UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries
2010s 65,172 13.20 million 13.13 million UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries
2020s 83,943 13.65 million 13.57 million UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enrolment in secondary education, female (number), gaps filled, Timor-Leste or UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries?
UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries, at 14.60 million against 83,943 in Timor-Leste as of 2024.
What is the difference in enrolment in secondary education, female (number), gaps filled between Timor-Leste and UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries?
14.52 million, with UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Timor-Leste and UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries?
17 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2020.
How do Timor-Leste and UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries rank globally for enrolment in secondary education, female (number), gaps filled?
Timor-Leste ranks 139th and UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries ranks 142nd of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Enrolment in secondary education, female (number), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Timor-Leste vs UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries: Enrolment in secondary education, female (number), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/enrolment-in-secondary-education-female-number-gaps-filled/timor-leste/unicef-europe-and-central-asia-programme-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/enrolment-in-secondary-education-female-number-gaps-filled/timor-leste/unicef-europe-and-central-asia-programme-countries/">Timor-Leste vs UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries: Enrolment in secondary education, female (number), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enrolment in secondary education, female (number), gaps filled
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
439 places, 19,497 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

Enrolment in secondary education, female (number) with 736 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.