AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific vs Pakistan: Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, both sexes (number)

AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific
92.85 million
in 2024
Pakistan
2.68 million
in 2024
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific rank
18th
Pakistan rank
19th

Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, both sexes (number) over time

  • AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific
  • Pakistan
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M197019972024

How they compare

AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific currently reports 92.85 million against 2.68 million in Pakistan, a difference of 90.17 million.

That makes AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific's figure about 34.6 times Pakistan's.

Across all 39 years both countries report, AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific has been ahead every year.

AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific ranks 18th and Pakistan ranks 19th of 221 groups.

AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific Pakistan Difference Ahead
1970s 5.19 million 124,146 5.07 million AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific
1980s 12.66 million 264,458 12.40 million AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific
1990s 15.33 million 263,118 15.06 million AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific
2000s 45.05 million 811,311 44.23 million AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific
2010s 66.93 million 1.89 million 65.05 million AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific
2020s 86.89 million 2.71 million 84.18 million AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, both sexes (number), AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific or Pakistan?
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific, at 92.85 million against 2.68 million in Pakistan as of 2024.
What is the difference in enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, both sexes (number) between AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and Pakistan?
90.17 million, with AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and Pakistan?
39 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2024.
How do AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and Pakistan rank globally for enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, both sexes (number)?
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific ranks 18th and Pakistan ranks 19th of 221 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, both sexes (number), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific vs Pakistan: Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, both sexes (number). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/enrolment-in-tertiary-education-all-programmes-both-sexes-number-gaps-filled/aims-east-asia-and-the-pacific/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/enrolment-in-tertiary-education-all-programmes-both-sexes-number-gaps-filled/aims-east-asia-and-the-pacific/pakistan/">AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific vs Pakistan: Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, both sexes (number)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, both sexes (number), gaps filled
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
421 places, 19,011 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, both sexes (number) with 690 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.