AIMS: Asia and the Pacific vs Russian Federation: Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number)

AIMS: Asia and the Pacific
75.66 million
in 2024
Russian Federation
2.28 million
in 2024
AIMS: Asia and the Pacific rank
13th
Russian Federation rank
10th

Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number) over time

  • AIMS: Asia and the Pacific
  • Russian Federation
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M197019972024

How they compare

AIMS: Asia and the Pacific currently reports 75.66 million against 2.28 million in Russian Federation, a difference of 73.38 million.

That makes AIMS: Asia and the Pacific's figure about 33.2 times Russian Federation's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Russian Federation ahead.

AIMS: Asia and the Pacific ranks 13th and Russian Federation ranks 10th of 221 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, AIMS: Asia and the Pacific averaged higher in 5 and Russian Federation in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade AIMS: Asia and the Pacific Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1970s 2.37 million 2.82 million 441,440 Russian Federation
1980s 5.76 million 3.15 million 2.61 million AIMS: Asia and the Pacific
1990s 10.52 million 2.67 million 7.85 million AIMS: Asia and the Pacific
2000s 27.78 million 4.95 million 22.83 million AIMS: Asia and the Pacific
2010s 53.27 million 3.81 million 49.45 million AIMS: Asia and the Pacific
2020s 70.63 million 2.10 million 68.53 million AIMS: Asia and the Pacific

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number), AIMS: Asia and the Pacific or Russian Federation?
AIMS: Asia and the Pacific, at 75.66 million against 2.28 million in Russian Federation as of 2024.
What is the difference in enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number) between AIMS: Asia and the Pacific and Russian Federation?
73.38 million, with AIMS: Asia and the Pacific ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Asia and the Pacific and Russian Federation?
30 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2024.
How do AIMS: Asia and the Pacific and Russian Federation rank globally for enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number)?
AIMS: Asia and the Pacific ranks 13th and Russian Federation ranks 10th of 221 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

AIMS: Asia and the Pacific vs Russian Federation: Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/enrolment-in-tertiary-education-all-programmes-female-number-gaps-filled/aims-asia-and-the-pacific/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/enrolment-in-tertiary-education-all-programmes-female-number-gaps-filled/aims-asia-and-the-pacific/russian-federation/">AIMS: Asia and the Pacific vs Russian Federation: Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number), gaps filled
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
416 places, 17,894 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number) with 647 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.