Cuba vs Finland: Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number)
Cuba
178,118
in 2024
Finland
187,925
in 2024
Cuba rank
67th
Finland rank
64th
Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number) over time
- Cuba
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 187,925 against 178,118 in Cuba, a difference of 9,807.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Finland ahead.
Cuba ranks 67th and Finland ranks 64th of 195 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 4 and Finland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 30,016 | 41,853 | 11,836 | Finland |
| 1980s | 109,085 | 63,161 | 45,923 | Cuba |
| 1990s | 99,128 | 107,926 | 8,798 | Finland |
| 2000s | 311,951 | 159,083 | 152,868 | Cuba |
| 2010s | 242,913 | 161,685 | 81,228 | Cuba |
| 2020s | 208,487 | 173,145 | 35,342 | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number), Cuba or Finland?
- Finland, at 187,925 against 178,118 in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number) between Cuba and Finland?
- 9,807, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Finland?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Finland rank globally for enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number)?
- Cuba ranks 67th and Finland ranks 64th of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number) with 647 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.