Czechia vs UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean: Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number)

Czechia
193,143
in 2023
UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean
17.84 million
in 2024
Czechia rank
62nd
UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean rank
59th

Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number) over time

  • Czechia
  • UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M197019972024

How they compare

UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean currently reports 17.84 million against 193,143 in Czechia, a difference of 17.65 million.

That makes UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean's figure about 92.4 times Czechia's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean has been ahead every year.

Czechia ranks 62nd and UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean ranks 59th of 195 countries.

UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean Difference Ahead
1970s 33,618 1.50 million 1.46 million UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean
1980s 46,738 3.45 million 3.40 million UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean
1990s 77,422 4.97 million 4.90 million UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean
2000s 172,174 8.84 million 8.67 million UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean
2010s 225,243 14.32 million 14.09 million UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean
2020s 188,534 17.48 million 17.29 million UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number), Czechia or UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean?
UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean, at 17.84 million against 193,143 in Czechia as of 2024.
What is the difference in enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number) between Czechia and UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean?
17.65 million, with UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean?
53 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do Czechia and UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean rank globally for enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number)?
Czechia ranks 62nd and UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean ranks 59th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean: Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/enrolment-in-tertiary-education-all-programmes-female-number-gaps-filled/czechia/unicef-latin-america-and-caribbean/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/enrolment-in-tertiary-education-all-programmes-female-number-gaps-filled/czechia/unicef-latin-america-and-caribbean/">Czechia vs UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean: Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number), gaps filled
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
416 places, 17,894 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number) with 647 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.