Mauritius vs Zambia: Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number)
Mauritius
25,882
in 2024
Zambia
24,494
in 2012
Mauritius rank
136th
Zambia rank
137th
Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number) over time
- Mauritius
- Zambia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 25,882 against 24,494 in Zambia, a difference of 1,388.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zambia ahead.
Mauritius ranks 136th and Zambia ranks 137th of 195 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 239 | 1,049 | 810.25 | Zambia |
| 1980s | 453.6 | 2,615 | 2,162 | Zambia |
| 1990s | 4,417 | 7,253 | 2,836 | Zambia |
| 2010s | 21,458 | 19,948 | 1,510 | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number), Mauritius or Zambia?
- Mauritius, at 25,882 against 24,494 in Zambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number) between Mauritius and Zambia?
- 1,388, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Zambia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2012.
- How do Mauritius and Zambia rank globally for enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number)?
- Mauritius ranks 136th and Zambia ranks 137th of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number) with 647 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.