Cambodia vs Sudan: Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number), per
Cambodia
0.0094 units per person
in 2024
Sudan
0.0081 units per person
in 2015
Cambodia rank
134th
Sudan rank
136th
Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number), per over time
- Cambodia
- Sudan
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 0.0094 units per person against 0.0081 units per person in Sudan, a difference of 0.0013 units per person.
That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.2 times Sudan's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Cambodia ranks 134th and Sudan ranks 136th of 192 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0018 units per person | 0.0059 units per person | 0.0041 units per person | Sudan |
| 2010s | 0.0054 units per person | 0.0078 units per person | 0.0024 units per person | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number), per, Cambodia or Sudan?
- Cambodia, at 0.0094 units per person against 0.0081 units per person in Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number), per between Cambodia and Sudan?
- 0.0013 units per person, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2015.
- How do Cambodia and Sudan rank globally for enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number), per?
- Cambodia ranks 134th and Sudan ranks 136th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.