Latvia vs Zambia: Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, male (number), gaps
Latvia
30,806
in 2024
Zambia
32,186
in 2012
Latvia rank
128th
Zambia rank
127th
Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, male (number), gaps over time
- Latvia
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 32,186 against 30,806 in Latvia, a difference of 1,380.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 128th and Zambia ranks 127th of 195 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 18,693 | 8,373 | 10,320 | Latvia |
| 1990s | 30,178 | 15,675 | 14,502 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 39,811 | 36,272 | 3,540 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, male (number), gaps, Latvia or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 32,186 against 30,806 in Latvia as of 2012.
- What is the difference in enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, male (number), gaps between Latvia and Zambia?
- 1,380, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Zambia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2012.
- How do Latvia and Zambia rank globally for enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, male (number), gaps?
- Latvia ranks 128th and Zambia ranks 127th of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, male (number), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, male (number) with 661 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.