China vs Low & middle income: Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 7 programmes, both sexes
China
2.41 million number
in 2019
Low & middle income
15.10 million number
in 2019
China rank
3rd
Low & middle income rank
3rd
Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 7 programmes, both sexes over time
- China
- Low & middle income
How they compare
Low & middle income currently reports 15.10 million number against 2.41 million number in China, a difference of 12.69 million number.
That makes Low & middle income's figure about 6.3 times China's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Low & middle income has been ahead every year.
China ranks 3rd and Low & middle income ranks 3rd of 107 countries.
Low & middle income has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enrolment in tertiary education, isced 7 programmes, both sexes, China or Low & middle income?
- Low & middle income, at 15.10 million number against 2.41 million number in China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enrolment in tertiary education, isced 7 programmes, both sexes between China and Low & middle income?
- 12.69 million number, with Low & middle income ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Low & middle income?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do China and Low & middle income rank globally for enrolment in tertiary education, isced 7 programmes, both sexes?
- China ranks 3rd and Low & middle income ranks 3rd of 107 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 7 programmes, both sexes (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total number of students enrolled in public and private tertiary education institutions in programmes on the masters or equivalent (ISCED 7) level.