China vs ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408): Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, adjusted gender parity index

China
1.03 GPIA
in 2012
ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408)
1.02 GPIA
in 2024
China rank
47th
ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) rank
49th

Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, adjusted gender parity index over time

  • China
  • ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408)
00.250.50.751199420092024

How they compare

China currently reports 1.03 GPIA against 1.02 GPIA in ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408), a difference of 0.01 GPIA.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 1995 it was ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) ahead.

China ranks 47th and ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) ranks 49th of 199 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) Difference Ahead
1990s 0.9039 GPIA 0.9195 GPIA 0.0156 GPIA ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408)
2000s 1 GPIA 1 GPIA 0.0002 GPIA ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408)
2010s 1.03 GPIA 1.03 GPIA 0.004 GPIA China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, adjusted gender parity index, China or ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408)?
China, at 1.03 GPIA against 1.02 GPIA in ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) as of 2012.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, adjusted gender parity index between China and ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408)?
0.01 GPIA, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408)?
14 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2012.
How do China and ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, adjusted gender parity index?
China ranks 47th and ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) ranks 49th of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408): Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, adjusted gender parity index. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-lower-secondary-adjusted-gender-parity-index-gpia/china/escap-east-and-north-east-asia-enea-unsdcode-98408/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-lower-secondary-adjusted-gender-parity-index-gpia/china/escap-east-and-north-east-asia-enea-unsdcode-98408/">China vs ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408): Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, adjusted gender parity index</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)
Unit
GPIA
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
420 places, 10,386 data points, 1985–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release