AIMS: Central Asia vs Latvia: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes
AIMS: Central Asia
96.4%
in 2024
Latvia
101.2%
in 2024
AIMS: Central Asia rank
72nd
Latvia rank
71st
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes over time
- AIMS: Central Asia
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 101.2% against 96.4% in AIMS: Central Asia, a difference of 4.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was AIMS: Central Asia ahead.
AIMS: Central Asia ranks 72nd and Latvia ranks 71st of 221 groups.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: Central Asia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94.3% | 103.0% | 8.7% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 94.1% | 104.6% | 10.5% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 93.7% | 100.9% | 7.2% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes, AIMS: Central Asia or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 101.2% against 96.4% in AIMS: Central Asia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes between AIMS: Central Asia and Latvia?
- 4.8%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Central Asia and Latvia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do AIMS: Central Asia and Latvia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes?
- AIMS: Central Asia ranks 72nd and Latvia ranks 71st of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release