AIMS: Pacific vs Iceland: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes
AIMS: Pacific
90.1%
in 2024
Iceland
98.2%
in 2023
AIMS: Pacific rank
95th
Iceland rank
92nd
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes over time
- AIMS: Pacific
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 98.2% against 90.1% in AIMS: Pacific, a difference of 8.1%.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times AIMS: Pacific's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 1999 it was AIMS: Pacific ahead.
AIMS: Pacific ranks 95th and Iceland ranks 92nd of 221 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, AIMS: Pacific averaged higher in 3 and Iceland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: Pacific | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 106.8% | 99.2% | 7.5% | AIMS: Pacific |
| 2000s | 107.7% | 99.2% | 8.5% | AIMS: Pacific |
| 2010s | 104.2% | 98.8% | 5.4% | AIMS: Pacific |
| 2020s | 90.4% | 98.6% | 8.2% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes, AIMS: Pacific or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 98.2% against 90.1% in AIMS: Pacific as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes between AIMS: Pacific and Iceland?
- 8.1%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Pacific and Iceland?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2023.
- How do AIMS: Pacific and Iceland rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes?
- AIMS: Pacific ranks 95th and Iceland ranks 92nd of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release