AIMS: Pacific vs Naoero: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes
AIMS: Pacific
90.1%
in 2024
Naoero
97.8%
in 2025
AIMS: Pacific rank
95th
Naoero rank
98th
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes over time
- AIMS: Pacific
- Naoero
How they compare
Naoero currently reports 97.8% against 90.1% in AIMS: Pacific, a difference of 7.7%.
That makes Naoero's figure about 1.1 times AIMS: Pacific's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2001 it was AIMS: Pacific ahead.
AIMS: Pacific ranks 95th and Naoero ranks 98th of 221 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, AIMS: Pacific averaged higher in 2 and Naoero in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: Pacific | Naoero | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 107.5% | 58.0% | 49.4% | AIMS: Pacific |
| 2010s | 103.4% | 80.1% | 23.2% | AIMS: Pacific |
| 2020s | 90.3% | 92.8% | 2.5% | Naoero |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes, AIMS: Pacific or Naoero?
- Naoero, at 97.8% against 90.1% in AIMS: Pacific as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes between AIMS: Pacific and Naoero?
- 7.7%, with Naoero ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Pacific and Naoero?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do AIMS: Pacific and Naoero rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes?
- AIMS: Pacific ranks 95th and Naoero ranks 98th of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release