Congo vs ECA: Comesa (unsdcode:98113): Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes
Congo
61.8%
in 2012
ECA: Comesa (unsdcode:98113)
57.0%
in 2023
Congo rank
173rd
ECA: Comesa (unsdcode:98113) rank
174th
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes over time
- Congo
- ECA: Comesa (unsdcode:98113)
How they compare
Congo currently reports 61.8% against 57.0% in ECA: Comesa (unsdcode:98113), a difference of 4.8%.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times ECA: Comesa (unsdcode:98113)'s.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 173rd and ECA: Comesa (unsdcode:98113) ranks 174th of 199 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | ECA: Comesa (unsdcode:98113) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 47.7% | 45.3% | 2.4% | Congo |
| 2000s | 51.7% | 47.6% | 4.0% | Congo |
| 2010s | 61.8% | 54.4% | 7.4% | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes, Congo or ECA: Comesa (unsdcode:98113)?
- Congo, at 61.8% against 57.0% in ECA: Comesa (unsdcode:98113) as of 2012.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes between Congo and ECA: Comesa (unsdcode:98113)?
- 4.8%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and ECA: Comesa (unsdcode:98113)?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2012.
- How do Congo and ECA: Comesa (unsdcode:98113) rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes?
- Congo ranks 173rd and ECA: Comesa (unsdcode:98113) ranks 174th of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release