ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) vs Namibia: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes

ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408)
99.7%
in 2024
Namibia
104.3%
in 2024
ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) rank
52nd
Namibia rank
50th

Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes over time

  • ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408)
  • Namibia
0255075100199420092024

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 104.3% against 99.7% in ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408), a difference of 4.6%.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Namibia ahead.

ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) ranks 52nd and Namibia ranks 50th of 221 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 79.4% 76.4% 3.0% ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408)
2000s 94.6% 83.1% 11.5% ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408)
2010s 97.2% 98.7% 1.5% Namibia
2020s 98.3% 104.3% 6.1% Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes, ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) or Namibia?
Namibia, at 104.3% against 99.7% in ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes between ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) and Namibia?
4.6%, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) and Namibia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) and Namibia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes?
ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) ranks 52nd and Namibia ranks 50th of 221 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) vs Namibia: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-lower-secondary-both-sexes-percent-2/escap-east-and-north-east-asia-enea-unsdcode-98408/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-lower-secondary-both-sexes-percent-2/escap-east-and-north-east-asia-enea-unsdcode-98408/namibia/">ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) vs Namibia: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
420 places, 10,466 data points, 1981–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release