ESCAP: North America (nam) (unsdcode:98425) vs Libya: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes
ESCAP: North America (nam) (unsdcode:98425)
99.5%
in 2024
Libya
102.8%
in 2006
ESCAP: North America (nam) (unsdcode:98425) rank
56th
Libya rank
56th
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes over time
- ESCAP: North America (nam) (unsdcode:98425)
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 102.8% against 99.5% in ESCAP: North America (nam) (unsdcode:98425), a difference of 3.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Libya ahead.
ESCAP: North America (nam) (unsdcode:98425) ranks 56th and Libya ranks 56th of 221 groups.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes, ESCAP: North America (nam) (unsdcode:98425) or Libya?
- Libya, at 102.8% against 99.5% in ESCAP: North America (nam) (unsdcode:98425) as of 2006.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes between ESCAP: North America (nam) (unsdcode:98425) and Libya?
- 3.3%, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for ESCAP: North America (nam) (unsdcode:98425) and Libya?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2006.
- How do ESCAP: North America (nam) (unsdcode:98425) and Libya rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes?
- ESCAP: North America (nam) (unsdcode:98425) ranks 56th and Libya ranks 56th of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release