ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) vs Zambia: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes

ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427)
63.1%
in 2019
Zambia
73.3%
in 2024
ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) rank
161st
Zambia rank
158th

Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes over time

  • ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427)
  • Zambia
3040506070199720102024

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 73.3% against 63.1% in ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427), a difference of 10.2%.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.2 times ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1998 it was ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) ahead.

ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) ranks 161st and Zambia ranks 158th of 221 groups.

ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 62.4% 26.2% 36.2% ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427)
2000s 68.1% 50.6% 17.5% ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427)
2010s 72.6% 64.3% 8.2% ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes, ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) or Zambia?
Zambia, at 73.3% against 63.1% in ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes between ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) and Zambia?
10.2%, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) and Zambia?
19 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2017.
How do ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) and Zambia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes?
ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) ranks 161st and Zambia ranks 158th of 221 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) vs Zambia: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-lower-secondary-both-sexes-percent-2/escap-pacific-island-developing-economies-pide-unsdcode-98427/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-lower-secondary-both-sexes-percent-2/escap-pacific-island-developing-economies-pide-unsdcode-98427/zambia/">ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) vs Zambia: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
420 places, 10,466 data points, 1981–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release