Latvia vs UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes

Latvia
101.2%
in 2024
UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries
96.9%
in 2024
Latvia rank
71st
UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries rank
69th

Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes over time

  • Latvia
  • UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries
0255075100199420092024

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 101.2% against 96.9% in UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries, a difference of 4.3%.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Latvia ranks 71st and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries ranks 69th of 199 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries Difference Ahead
2000s 103.0% 89.3% 13.7% Latvia
2010s 104.6% 93.9% 10.7% Latvia
2020s 100.9% 96.4% 4.5% Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes, Latvia or UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries?
Latvia, at 101.2% against 96.9% in UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes between Latvia and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries?
4.3%, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries?
24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Latvia and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes?
Latvia ranks 71st and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries ranks 69th of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-lower-secondary-both-sexes-percent-2/latvia/unicef-east-asia-and-the-pacific-programme-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-lower-secondary-both-sexes-percent-2/latvia/unicef-east-asia-and-the-pacific-programme-countries/">Latvia vs UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
420 places, 10,466 data points, 1981–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release