Latvia vs WB: Ibrd Only: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes
Latvia
101.2%
in 2024
WB: Ibrd Only
96.4%
in 2024
Latvia rank
71st
WB: Ibrd Only rank
74th
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes over time
- Latvia
- WB: Ibrd Only
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 101.2% against 96.4% in WB: Ibrd Only, a difference of 4.8%.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 71st and WB: Ibrd Only ranks 74th of 199 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | WB: Ibrd Only | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 103.0% | 86.8% | 16.2% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 104.6% | 94.4% | 10.2% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 100.9% | 96.5% | 4.4% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes, Latvia or WB: Ibrd Only?
- Latvia, at 101.2% against 96.4% in WB: Ibrd Only as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes between Latvia and WB: Ibrd Only?
- 4.8%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and WB: Ibrd Only?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and WB: Ibrd Only rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes?
- Latvia ranks 71st and WB: Ibrd Only ranks 74th of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release