Australia vs Early-demographic dividend: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes over time
- Australia
- Early-demographic dividend
How they compare
Australia currently reports 110.5% against 85.6% in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 24.9%.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.3 times Early-demographic dividend's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 27th and Early-demographic dividend ranks 27th of 188 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Early-demographic dividend | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 109.5% | 63.8% | 45.7% | Australia |
| 2010s | 118.6% | 86.0% | 32.7% | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes, Australia or Early-demographic dividend?
- Australia, at 110.5% against 85.6% in Early-demographic dividend as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes between Australia and Early-demographic dividend?
- 24.9%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Early-demographic dividend?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2018.
- How do Australia and Early-demographic dividend rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes?
- Australia ranks 27th and Early-demographic dividend ranks 27th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.