Denmark vs Post-demographic dividend: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes
Denmark
120.9%
in 2018
Post-demographic dividend
102.9%
in 2019
Denmark rank
11th
Post-demographic dividend rank
8th
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes over time
- Denmark
- Post-demographic dividend
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 120.9% against 102.9% in Post-demographic dividend, a difference of 18.0%.
That makes Denmark's figure about 1.2 times Post-demographic dividend's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.
Denmark ranks 11th and Post-demographic dividend ranks 8th of 188 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Post-demographic dividend | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 123.1% | 102.5% | 20.6% | Denmark |
| 2000s | 119.2% | 103.1% | 16.1% | Denmark |
| 2010s | 117.8% | 103.6% | 14.2% | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes, Denmark or Post-demographic dividend?
- Denmark, at 120.9% against 102.9% in Post-demographic dividend as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes between Denmark and Post-demographic dividend?
- 18.0%, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Post-demographic dividend?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2018.
- How do Denmark and Post-demographic dividend rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes?
- Denmark ranks 11th and Post-demographic dividend ranks 8th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.