East Asia & Pacific vs Luxembourg: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes
East Asia & Pacific
94.7%
in 2019
Luxembourg
116.9%
in 2018
East Asia & Pacific rank
16th
Luxembourg rank
17th
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes over time
- East Asia & Pacific
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 116.9% against 94.7% in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 22.2%.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.2 times East Asia & Pacific's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
East Asia & Pacific ranks 16th and Luxembourg ranks 17th of 45 groups.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 76.8% | 104.8% | 28.0% | Luxembourg |
| 2000s | 86.3% | 106.6% | 20.3% | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 92.0% | 114.6% | 22.6% | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes, East Asia & Pacific or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 116.9% against 94.7% in East Asia & Pacific as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes between East Asia & Pacific and Luxembourg?
- 22.2%, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Luxembourg?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2018.
- How do East Asia & Pacific and Luxembourg rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes?
- East Asia & Pacific ranks 16th and Luxembourg ranks 17th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.