Latvia vs Libya: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes
Latvia
103.1%
in 2018
Libya
103.3%
in 2006
Latvia rank
61st
Libya rank
60th
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes over time
- Latvia
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 103.3% against 103.1% in Latvia, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Libya ahead.
Latvia ranks 61st and Libya ranks 60th of 188 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes, Latvia or Libya?
- Libya, at 103.3% against 103.1% in Latvia as of 2006.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes between Latvia and Libya?
- 0.2%, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Libya?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2006.
- How do Latvia and Libya rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes?
- Latvia ranks 61st and Libya ranks 60th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.