Lithuania vs Low income: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes
Lithuania
106.2%
in 2018
Low income
48.1%
in 2018
Lithuania rank
44th
Low income rank
45th
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes over time
- Lithuania
- Low income
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 106.2% against 48.1% in Low income, a difference of 58.1%.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 2.2 times Low income's.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 44th and Low income ranks 45th of 188 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Low income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 89.4% | 30.3% | 59.1% | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 104.0% | 38.4% | 65.6% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 104.5% | 47.9% | 56.6% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes, Lithuania or Low income?
- Lithuania, at 106.2% against 48.1% in Low income as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes between Lithuania and Low income?
- 58.1%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Low income?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2018.
- How do Lithuania and Low income rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes?
- Lithuania ranks 44th and Low income ranks 45th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.