Lithuania vs Pre-demographic dividend: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes over time
- Lithuania
- Pre-demographic dividend
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 106.2% against 51.2% in Pre-demographic dividend, a difference of 55.0%.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 2.1 times Pre-demographic dividend's.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 44th and Pre-demographic dividend ranks 43rd of 188 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Pre-demographic dividend | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 89.4% | 26.4% | 63.0% | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 104.0% | 35.1% | 68.9% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 104.5% | 49.1% | 55.4% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes, Lithuania or Pre-demographic dividend?
- Lithuania, at 106.2% against 51.2% in Pre-demographic dividend as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes between Lithuania and Pre-demographic dividend?
- 55.0%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Pre-demographic dividend?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2018.
- How do Lithuania and Pre-demographic dividend rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes?
- Lithuania ranks 44th and Pre-demographic dividend ranks 43rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.