Lower middle income vs Maldives: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes over time
- Lower middle income
- Maldives
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 108.1% against 79.5% in Lower middle income, a difference of 28.6%.
That makes Maldives's figure about 1.4 times Lower middle income's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Lower middle income ahead.
Lower middle income ranks 34th and Maldives ranks 33rd of 45 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lower middle income averaged higher in 1 and Maldives in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lower middle income | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 58.4% | 57.2% | 1.2% | Lower middle income |
| 2000s | 65.5% | 105.7% | 40.2% | Maldives |
| 2010s | 77.9% | 113.1% | 35.1% | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes, Lower middle income or Maldives?
- Maldives, at 108.1% against 79.5% in Lower middle income as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes between Lower middle income and Maldives?
- 28.6%, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lower middle income and Maldives?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2019.
- How do Lower middle income and Maldives rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes?
- Lower middle income ranks 34th and Maldives ranks 33rd of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.