Pacific island small states vs Tonga: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes
Pacific island small states
90.3%
in 2019
Tonga
111.9%
in 2015
Pacific island small states rank
24th
Tonga rank
22nd
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes over time
- Pacific island small states
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 111.9% against 90.3% in Pacific island small states, a difference of 21.6%.
That makes Tonga's figure about 1.2 times Pacific island small states's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Tonga has been ahead every year.
Pacific island small states ranks 24th and Tonga ranks 22nd of 45 groups.
Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pacific island small states | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 76.6% | 107.6% | 31.0% | Tonga |
| 2000s | 82.4% | 108.5% | 26.1% | Tonga |
| 2010s | 93.1% | 110.6% | 17.5% | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes, Pacific island small states or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 111.9% against 90.3% in Pacific island small states as of 2015.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes between Pacific island small states and Tonga?
- 21.6%, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pacific island small states and Tonga?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2015.
- How do Pacific island small states and Tonga rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes?
- Pacific island small states ranks 24th and Tonga ranks 22nd of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.