AIMS: Central Asia vs Latvia: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female
AIMS: Central Asia
95.6%
in 2024
Latvia
100.7%
in 2024
AIMS: Central Asia rank
73rd
Latvia rank
71st
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female over time
- AIMS: Central Asia
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 100.7% against 95.6% in AIMS: Central Asia, a difference of 5.1%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times AIMS: Central Asia's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
AIMS: Central Asia ranks 73rd and Latvia ranks 71st of 221 groups.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: Central Asia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 92.0% | 101.1% | 9.1% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 92.9% | 103.1% | 10.2% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 92.8% | 100.5% | 7.7% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female, AIMS: Central Asia or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 100.7% against 95.6% in AIMS: Central Asia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female between AIMS: Central Asia and Latvia?
- 5.1%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Central Asia and Latvia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do AIMS: Central Asia and Latvia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female?
- AIMS: Central Asia ranks 73rd and Latvia ranks 71st of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release