AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific vs Lithuania: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific
97.4%
in 2024
Lithuania
101.8%
in 2024
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific rank
63rd
Lithuania rank
64th
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female over time
- AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 101.8% against 97.4% in AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific, a difference of 4.4%.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific ranks 63rd and Lithuania ranks 64th of 221 groups.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90.5% | 103.3% | 12.8% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 95.6% | 102.2% | 6.6% | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 97.1% | 102.3% | 5.2% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female, AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 101.8% against 97.4% in AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female between AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and Lithuania?
- 4.4%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and Lithuania?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and Lithuania rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female?
- AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific ranks 63rd and Lithuania ranks 64th of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release