AIMS: East Asia vs Finland: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female
AIMS: East Asia
97.7%
in 2024
Finland
102.6%
in 2024
AIMS: East Asia rank
61st
Finland rank
58th
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female over time
- AIMS: East Asia
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 102.6% against 97.7% in AIMS: East Asia, a difference of 4.9%.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
AIMS: East Asia ranks 61st and Finland ranks 58th of 221 groups.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: East Asia | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90.3% | 101.1% | 10.9% | Finland |
| 2010s | 95.5% | 101.2% | 5.7% | Finland |
| 2020s | 97.3% | 102.3% | 5.0% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female, AIMS: East Asia or Finland?
- Finland, at 102.6% against 97.7% in AIMS: East Asia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female between AIMS: East Asia and Finland?
- 4.9%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: East Asia and Finland?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do AIMS: East Asia and Finland rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female?
- AIMS: East Asia ranks 61st and Finland ranks 58th of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release