AIMS: East Asia vs South Africa: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female
AIMS: East Asia
97.7%
in 2024
South Africa
102.0%
in 2023
AIMS: East Asia rank
61st
South Africa rank
63rd
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female over time
- AIMS: East Asia
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 102.0% against 97.7% in AIMS: East Asia, a difference of 4.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1998 it was South Africa ahead.
AIMS: East Asia ranks 61st and South Africa ranks 63rd of 221 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, AIMS: East Asia averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: East Asia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 75.6% | 89.6% | 14.0% | South Africa |
| 2000s | 88.9% | 87.0% | 1.9% | AIMS: East Asia |
| 2010s | 95.9% | 103.9% | 8.0% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 97.2% | 103.4% | 6.1% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female, AIMS: East Asia or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 102.0% against 97.7% in AIMS: East Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female between AIMS: East Asia and South Africa?
- 4.3%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: East Asia and South Africa?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2023.
- How do AIMS: East Asia and South Africa rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female?
- AIMS: East Asia ranks 61st and South Africa ranks 63rd of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release