Brazil vs ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417): Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female

Brazil
104.6%
in 2024
ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417)
100.9%
in 2024
Brazil rank
49th
ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) rank
48th

Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female over time

  • Brazil
  • ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417)
0255075100199920112024

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 104.6% against 100.9% in ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417), a difference of 3.7%.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 49th and ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) ranks 48th of 199 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) Difference Ahead
2010s 106.9% 94.2% 12.7% Brazil
2020s 108.9% 99.7% 9.2% Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female, Brazil or ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417)?
Brazil, at 104.6% against 100.9% in ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female between Brazil and ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417)?
3.7%, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417)?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
How do Brazil and ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female?
Brazil ranks 49th and ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) ranks 48th of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417): Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-lower-secondary-female-percent-2/brazil/escap-north-and-central-asia-nca-unsdcode-98417/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-lower-secondary-female-percent-2/brazil/escap-north-and-central-asia-nca-unsdcode-98417/">Brazil vs ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417): Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
420 places, 10,391 data points, 1985–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release