ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) vs Finland: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female
ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201)
99.1%
in 2024
Finland
102.6%
in 2024
ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) rank
56th
Finland rank
58th
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female over time
- ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201)
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 102.6% against 99.1% in ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201), a difference of 3.5%.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) ranks 56th and Finland ranks 58th of 221 groups.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.9% | 101.1% | 9.3% | Finland |
| 2010s | 94.2% | 101.2% | 7.0% | Finland |
| 2020s | 98.4% | 102.3% | 3.9% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female, ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) or Finland?
- Finland, at 102.6% against 99.1% in ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female between ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) and Finland?
- 3.5%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) and Finland?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) and Finland rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female?
- ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) ranks 56th and Finland ranks 58th of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release