ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) vs Libya: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female
ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201)
99.1%
in 2024
Libya
102.5%
in 2006
ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) rank
56th
Libya rank
59th
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female over time
- ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201)
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 102.5% against 99.1% in ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201), a difference of 3.4%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.
ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) ranks 56th and Libya ranks 59th of 221 groups.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female, ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) or Libya?
- Libya, at 102.5% against 99.1% in ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) as of 2006.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female between ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) and Libya?
- 3.4%, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) and Libya?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2006.
- How do ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) and Libya rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female?
- ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) ranks 56th and Libya ranks 59th of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release